By Luo Yanjie
China’s Got Talent broadcasted on Dragon TV has seen its 4th season this year, and during the past couple years, the show has been one of the most popular interactive reality TV shows in China. The main reason contributing to the show’s success is its high production level and the claimed license from British copyright owner which makes the program the true Talent like its British and American equivalents. However, in fact, Dragon TV’s statement is not legally accurate by China Copyright Law for the show is kind of transfer of the British program format. Today, the essay will tell you shall the program format be protected by law and what kind protection it is.
I. The overall program format may not be protected by China Copyright Law
It’s the WORKS could be protected by China Copyright Law, and the law also makes a detailed classification on the WORKS, but no sort of program format could be found. Furthermore, by the litigation purpose of the China Copyright Law, the legal protection only covers the “content” rather than the “idea” or the “originality”, that does not mean a unfair protection for the lawmaker’s effort to avoid the monopoly on “originality”. And the so called program format is actually kind of originality with no content on itself, and hereby it could not be the protective object on Copyright Law.
For no doubt, the independent music or the picture in background design may enjoy the protection from China Copyright Law; however such a protection has no connection to the program format for those protected are the music works or fine art works in law.
II. The program name may be applied as trademark for the legal protection
As discussed above, the program format could not be protected by China Copyright Law but that does not mean it has no way to be put under legal protection. The most direct way is to register it as a trademark. For China’s Got Talent, the program organizer may register the name as well as the frequently sued marks in it as trademarks, and that could prohibit other producers or television use the identical or similar names in their shows. Also this suggestion could be applied to other international brands used in China.
But it shall also be kept in mind that the protective object on China Trademark Law could only be the mark and the program content, format or originality is not in the trademark protection scope.
III. The Anti-unfair Competition Law may be applied in particular situations
As provided in the Anti-unfair Competition Law,
“using, without authorization, the name, packaging or decoration peculiar to well-known goods or using a name, packaging or decoration similar to that of well-known goods, so that his goods are confused with the well-known goods of another person, causing buyers to mistake them for the well-known goods of the other person;”
could constitute the unfair competition and shall take the tort liability accordingly.
Despite the program could not be listed in normal products, I still prefer to apply the regulation. Supposing Dragon TV has gained no copyright license (by the way I would like to regard it as a brand license) from the British copyright owner, the broadcast of the show on Dragon TV will no doubt be unfair competition conducts for the Chinese show shares the same background setting and program format with the British show and that may confuse the audiences of any possible link between the show or misunderstand the show on Dragon TV the Chinese version of Britain’s Got Talent. (Considering the communication on Internet, Britain’s Got Talent is still reputed in China though it has ever been broadcasted on local televisions. Once the Chinese show intends to be confused with the British show, it constitutes a unfair competition conduct)
But the standard to judge the misunderstanding among programs in China Anti-unfair Competition Law is high. On behalf of the ordinary shows, it’s less likely to be judged a misunderstanding. So far we have seen the quarrel between Hunan TV’s Take Me Out and Jiangsu TV’s If You Are The One in the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television. Both the shows are dating program, and Hunan TV claimed a plagiarism by Jiangsu TV. In our opinions, both shows only resemble each other in themes and format, and share no common points otherwise. As the afore analysis, with the aim to prevent theme monopoly, no law will protect the theme only. And for this reason, we could still see the co-existence of the shows and no administrative adjudication has been made on the dispute, and also Hunan TV is less likely to bring it to the court.
In a word, the program format is could not be protected by existing laws, and with the regulations of Trademark Law and Anti-unfair Competition Law, the program names, marks and other elements easy to be misunderstood could be protected. Also I hold a positive attitude to the current litigation for the law could not suppress other’s originality. For the works created on other’s ideas, the law shall not make any prohibition on it.
Other recommended posts on our website:
1. The Actual Term of Trademark Registration in China
2. How to Apply for the Trademark Record in China Custom
3. How to improve the success rate of trademark registration in China?
4. Matters for Attention in Trademark Refusal Review in China
5. Introduction of China’s Legal System of Trademark Renewal
6. Introduction on the Regulations concerning the Capital Contribution in IPR or Domain Name in China
7. The Copyright Registration in China Could Be FREE?
8. China Copyright Protection Term Longer than EU’s?
9. Matters for Attention in the Patent Preliminary Injunction Application in China(I)
Lawyer Contacts
You Yunting
86-21-52134918
youyunting@debund.com, yytbest@gmail.com
For further information, please contact the lawyer as listed above or through the methods in our CONTACTS.
Bridge IP Law Commentary’s posts, including the comments and opinions contained herein, shall not be construed as the legal advice on any issues related. The contents are for general information purposes only. Anyone willing to quote or refer the posts to any other publications or for any other purposes, no matter there’s benefits gained or not, shall first get the written consent from Bridge IP Law Commentary and used under the discretion of us. As to the application of the reprint permission for any of our posts, please email us to the above addresses. The publication of this post or transmission of it through mail, internet or other methods does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. The views set forth here are of due diligence, neutrality and impartiality, representing our own opinions only and are our original works.
Short Link: