Is OEM the Safe Harbor for Trademark Infringement in China?

(By Albert Chen) Whether original equipment manufacturing (OEM) can lead to trademark infringement has been long argued. The opinions on it may vary among the judicial organs in various regions and between the judicial department and various administrative departments. A Shanghai court once confirmed that a processing party should not assume infringement liability in the case Shenda vs. Jolida. Following this decision, some began to advocate the idea that OEMs could be considered a safe harbor in the seas of trademark infringement. Can that point of view reasonably be established in China? In today’s post, we would like to introduce you to Chinese cases and popular opinions in judicial circles concerning OEMs and trademark infringement.

READ MORE

Export Rebate: The Secret to the Cheaper Made-in-China Product Selling Outside China

It’s widely known that made-in-China products are selling at a cheaper price outside China, not only the OEM articles like Nike, but the China based Lenovo also follow that pricing. There are many reasons contributing to the different price, including pricing strategy, logistic cost, office rent, taxation and even the change or exchange rate. IN this essay, we prefer to discuss the cause of a cheaper price of the same article overseas from the aspect of tax rebate.

I. VAT rebated in export

To take the Nike shoes as the instance, when Nike plants export the shoes, China taxation authority will rebate the paid VAT occurred during the process of production and circulation before the export, and that’s called the “export tax rebate”. So, let’s first take a look at how many taxes shall be paid within Nike shoes’ manufacture and circulation before the export.

READ MORE