↓

Bridge IP Law Commentary

Your Guide to China IP Law!

  • Home
  • About
  • Team
  • Contact
  • Services
Bridge IP Law Commentary
Home Menu ↓
Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content
  • Trademark
    • Registration
    • Protection
    • Settlement
  • Copyright
    • Registration
    • Protection
    • Settlement
  • Patent
    • Registration
    • Protection
    • Settlement
  • Corporation
    • Establishment
    • Operation
    • Structuring
  • Trade Secret
    • Protection
    • Litigation
  • Competition law
    • Anti-trust
    • Unfair competition
  • Laws & Regulations

Tag Archives: virtual services

Could the Account of SNS, IM and Online Game be Inherited in China?

Posted on November 2, 2011 by You Yunting

—The virtual inheritance by China laws and regulations

Highlight: The internet plays a more and more important role in daily life with the rapid development of the online society, and there have emerged various digital properties including instant messenger, blog and virtual properties, which inheritance however has been a new legal problem.

It’s reported that Tencent QQ, the most popular instant messenger in China with a maximum online population of 140 million, has refused the requests to inherit the QQ account for several times.

READ MORE
Posted in Copyright, Non-litigation, Protection | Tagged chat logs privacy, China Inheritance Law, copyright inheritance, digital heritage, digital legacy, feature of property, inheritance, instance messenger account inheritance, instant messenger, intellectual property inheritance, online game account inheritance, personal right inheritance, property law, QQ, QQ account inheritance, QQ account ownership, SNS account, social network site accout inheritance, succession law, Tencent, virtual heritage in China, virtual items, virtual property, virtual services, visual currency inheritance, visual currency law, visual property inheritance | Leave a reply
  • Friendly Links
  • China Law Blog
  • Chinamarketing
  • PingWest
  • ©copyright
  • Policy
© 2025 - Bridge IP Law Commentary
↑