↓

Bridge IP Law Commentary

Your Guide to China IP Law!

  • Home
  • About
  • Team
  • Contact
  • Services
Bridge IP Law Commentary
Home Menu ↓
Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content
  • Trademark
    • Registration
    • Protection
    • Settlement
  • Copyright
    • Registration
    • Protection
    • Settlement
  • Patent
    • Registration
    • Protection
    • Settlement
  • Corporation
    • Establishment
    • Operation
    • Structuring
  • Trade Secret
    • Protection
    • Litigation
  • Competition law
    • Anti-trust
    • Unfair competition
  • Laws & Regulations

Tag Archives: set list

Introduction and Interpretation on China’s Judicial Interpretation of the Right to Network Dissemination of Information, II

Posted on February 28, 2013 by yytbest

Today, we are going to continue our interpretation of the “Regulation on Several Issues concerning the Application of Law in Hearing Civil Disputes on Infringement against the Right to Network Dissemination of Information” (the “Network Interpretations”), basing on the review over the legislature on the right of information communication by networks in China:

Part II, Explanation of Network Interpretations

1. PSP users cannot claim to be free of liability on the basis of a personal use defense.

READ MORE
Posted in Trademark | Tagged active examination obligation, blocking, briefing, bt, cancellation, catalogue, choose, Civil Procedure Law, conducts infringing information communication by network, court in the place of the defendant’s residence, credit reward, descriptive paragraph, determination of fault, disconnection, download, edit, email, eMule, encourage, fair measures, fair response, fair use, fax, free liability condition, free of liability, gains from the ads casting, hot strike films and televisions, ICP, individual use, infringement notice, instigate, internet content provider, internet service provider, interpretation, introduction, ISP, joint infringement liability, Judicial interpretation on right of information communication by network, jurisdiction doctrine, jurisdiction of the court in the place located the server of the infringing website, malicious communication of others’ work, modify, notice, obviously known, p2p, performance, personal study, place located the terminal by which discover the infringement, place occurring the infringement, post mail, prevent infringement, provider of Internet interlinking, radio & video recording, raking, receive infringement notice, reference, Regulation on Several Issues concerning Law Application in Hearing Civil Disputes of Infringement against the Right of Information Communication by Networks, repeated infringement, research and appreciation, right holder, safe harbor principle, same network user, set list, set public sharing document, shall be known, sharing, substantially replace, support on promotion technology, Supreme people’s court, technological measures, unlicensed provision, webpage snapshot, work | Leave a reply

Regulation on Several Issues concerning the Application of Law in Hearing Civil Disputes of Infringement against Information Network Broadcasting Rights by the Supreme People’s Court

Posted on February 22, 2013 by yytbest

Adopted at the 1561st Session of the Judicial Committee of the Supreme People’s Court on November 26, 2012, and came into effect from January 1, 2013.

For the purpose of correctly trying civil disputes of infringement of information network broadcasting rights, lawfully protecting the right of information network communication, promoting the healthy development of the information network industry and maintaining the public interest, according to the General Principles of Civil Law of the PRC, the Tort Liability Law of the PRC, the Copyright Law of the PRC,  the Civil Procedure Law of the PRC and other relevant laws and regulations, in combination with civil trial practice, the regulation is made as follows:

READ MORE
Posted in Laws & Regulations | Tagged active examination obligation, blocking, briefing, bt, cancellation, catalogue, China Academy of Science, choose, Civil Procedure Law, conducts infringing information communication by network, copyright law, court in the place of the defendant’s residence, credit reward, deletion, descriptive paragraph, determination of fault, development, disconnection, download, edit, email, eMule, encourage, fair measures, fair response, fair use, fax, free liability condition, free of liability, gains from the ads casting, history, hot strike films and televisions, ICP, individual use, infringement notice, instigate, internet content provider, internet service provider, interpretation, Interpretation on Several Issues concerning Law Application in Hearing Cases related to the Computer Network Copyright Dispute, introduction, ISP, joint infringement liability, joint liability, Judicial interpretation on information communication by network right, Judicial interpretation on right of information communication by network, jurisdiction doctrine, jurisdiction of the court in the place located the server of the infringing website, malicious communication of others’ work, modify, NCFC, necessary measures, notice, NSFNET, obviously known, p2p, performance, personal study, place located the terminal by which discover the infringement, place occurring the infringement, post mail, prevent infringement, protection regulation over the information communication by network, provider of Internet interlinking, radio & video recording, raking, receive infringement notice, reference, Regulation on Several Issues concerning Law Application in Hearing Civil Disputes of Infringement against the Right of Information Communication by Networks, repeated infringement, research and appreciation, right holder, safe harbor principle, same network user, set list, set public sharing document, shall be known, sharing, substantially replace, support on promotion technology, Supreme people’s court, technological measures, tort liability law, unlicensed provision, webpage snapshot, work | Leave a reply
  • Friendly Links
  • China Law Blog
  • Chinamarketing
  • PingWest
  • ©copyright
  • Policy
© 2026 - Bridge IP Law Commentary
↑