The two lawsuits concerning the iPad trademarks have both gained the new progress in this month (2012.6)
For the trial between Apple and Proview, as introduced by the spokesman of the Guangdong People’s High Court’s Foreign Affair Office, the case will not be judged in recent for the companies are in the negotiation for the renegotiation with the presiding of the court. By the Civil Procedure Law
“In trying an appealed case against a judgment, the people s court shall make a final judgment within three months after the case was filed as one of second instance. Any extension of the term necessitated by special circumstances shall be subject to the approval of the president of the said court.”
Meanwhile, the spokesman of the high court also told us, the bankruptcy and liquidation case between Fubon and Proview involves no adjudication over the iPad belonging and the case will not be delayed in sentence.
More iPad news, please check the following posts:
1. No “iPad” Chinese trademark right for Apple after payment in the transaction, and our analysis——the Key points to the trademark transaction under the frame of China laws;
2. According to China Court’s First Instance Judgement, Apple Loses the iPad Trademark;
3. The Extension of the iPad Trademark Battle: Proview Charged iPad Distributor GOME in China;
4. Before 2nd Instance of iPad Trademark Dispute: iPad was Withdrew in Some Cities by Local Chinese Government;
5. Latest News of iPad Battle: Shenzhen Court Refused Bankruptcy Application against Shenzhen Proview
Lawyer Contacts
You Yunting
86-21-52134918
youyunting@debund.com, yytbest@gmail.com
For further information, please contact the lawyer as listed above or through the methods in our CONTACTS.
Bridge IP Law Commentary’s posts, including the comments and opinions contained herein, shall not be construed as the legal advice on any issues related. The contents are for general information purposes only. Anyone willing to quote or refer the posts to any other publications or for any other purposes, no matter there’s benefits gained or not, shall first get the written consent from Bridge IP Law Commentary and used under the discretion of us. As to the application of the reprint permission for any of our posts, please email us to the above addresses. The publication of this post or transmission of it through mail, internet or other methods does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. The views set forth here are of due diligence, neutrality and impartiality, representing our own opinions only and are our original works.
Short Link: