Category Archives: Copyright

Regulations against Intellectual Property Malicious Litigation in China

Posted on by

    (By You Yunting) Malicious litigation refers to instituting a lawsuit through fictional facts and falsified evidences for the purpose of receiving unlawful benefits. In today’s post, we will introduce some provisions about malicious litigation in intellectual property laws and civil procedure law in China.

    I. Provisions on wrongful litigation injunction can be applied into malicious litigation.

    In litigations concerning patent, trademark and copyright, the right holder always applies for such litigation injunctions as termination of infringement, evidence preservation and property preservation. Where the court approved the application, if the litigation is proved to be malicious, the respondent may require the applicant to compensate for such losses. Article 13 of the Several Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on the Issues Concerning the Application of Law to Terminating Infringement upon Patent Prior to Litigation stipulates that:

READ MORE

Linking Copyrighted Movies Constituted Non-infringement

Posted on by
youku

(By Luo Yanjie) Recently, our team represented a client who developed an App offering a linking service, in an infringement case over the linking of a copyrighted video on the mobile internet. The court made a final judgment in favor of our client, on the grounds that the safe harbor principle applied in this case. In today’s post, we will introduce this case below.

Introduction to the Case:

Plaintiff: China Film Media Asia Audio Video Distribution Co. Ltd (the “China Film Media Co. Ltd”)

READ MORE

Why Wasn’t Baidu Library Protected Under Safe Harbor Principle?

Posted on by
baiduwenku

(By Luo Yanjie) In our previous post Baidu Library Ordered to Pay Huge Huge Compensation on for Copyright Infringement, we discussed the amount of the compensation in the case of Beijing China Youth Book Inc. vs Baidu Library. Yesterday, we found out the reasoning and judgment held by Beijing No.1 Intermediate People’s Court. Thus, in today’s post we will analyze the legal basis about this case from the perspective of the judgment.

Introduction to the Case:

Plaintiff: Beijing China Youth Book Inc. (the “Youth Book Inc.”)

READ MORE

What kinds of Copyright Shall Television Watch-back Services Be?

Posted on by
topway

(By You Yunting) The U.S-based TiVo Inc. developed and marketed its TiVo, a digital video recorder (DVR), which can provide programs and services like on-demand and watch-back for its users. Similar to TiVo, Chinese cable operators and cable television stations provides similar services for its programs, shows and services. This means that users who miss the program can choose an on-demand program on the television. However, cable television stations are generally purchasing the right of broadcasting for the program, without the right of communication of information via a network. This purchase is at risk of copyright infringement. In a previous post Which Copyright Should an Internet TV Operator Purchase?, we discussed the difference between the right of broadcasting and the right of communication of information via network. Today we will introduce such a typical case in the following.

READ MORE

Baidu Library Makes Huge Compensation on Copyright Infringement for Publishing Press

Posted on by
baiduwenku

(By You Yunting) Recently, in the proceeding litigation alleging copyright infringement, Beijing China Youth Book Inc. vs Baidu Library, the Beijing No.1 Intermediate People’s Court issued a judgment requiring that Baidu compensate Beijing China Youth Book Inc. 350,000 Yuan. When compared with the 20,000 Yuan compensation required for a pirated movie, the ordered compensation is much larger than expected. This simultaneously reflects the strengthening of legal sanctions against internet copyright infringement and suggests that the standard on which copyright infringement compensation is judged lacks rationality in China.

READ MORE

Haidian Court Issued a Copyright Litigation Injunction Preventing Competitor from Broadcasting I am A Singer

Posted on by
我是歌手

(By You Yunting) We have already introduced litigation injunctions regarding patent, trademark and trade-secret proceedings in our previous posts. Today we would like to introduce a copyright injunction that Haidian District Lower People’s Court issued a copyright litigation injunction to prevent Funshion.com from copyright infringement of I Am a Singer (a popular Talent Show in China).

Introduction to the Case:

Plaintiff:  Letv.com

Defendant: Funshion.com

Court:Haidian District Lower People’s Court

READ MORE

Should Qian Zhongshu’s Letter Manuscripts be Protected After He Passed Away?

Posted on by

(By You Yunting) Abstract: In the proceedings of Qian Zhongshu’s letter manuscripts, in ruling whether the privacy right of decedents to a person should be protected by laws, the court decided that the relevant letters and manuscripts are irrelevant to the public interest and thus are private. However, the protective scope of the privacy right between the decedents of a person and a currently living person is different, and the protection of privacy right of decedents is weaker than the right of the public to be informed. The auctioning of these letters and manuscripts would, if it didn’t act to harm the reputations of Qian Zhongshu’s successors and relatives, not constitute an invasion of privacy.

READ MORE

How does Microsoft Settle its Problems of Software Copyright Infringement in China?

Posted on by
microsoft

 (By You Yunting) With the serious intellectual property rights infringement in China, many foreign enterprises find it difficult to protect their rights. In today’s post, we will introduce a case detailing how Microsoft settles its problems of software copyright infringement in China.

Introduction to the Case:

Plaintiff: Microsoft

Defendant: Sailun Co., Ltd (SHA: 601058)

Court of first instance: Qingdao Intermediate People’s Court

No.: (2013)青知民初字第80号, (2013)青知民初字第81号, (2013)青知民初字第82号

READ MORE

Questions and Solutions to Enforcement of Rights Protection by Overseas Software Enterprise in China

Posted on by

(By Luo Yanjie) Abstract:In the litigation of software infringement, the most fundamental evidence is that which is used to prove that the infringed software used by the defendant is plaintiff’s. It is urgent that China strengthens its punishment of infringement so as to protect commercial order and stability.

Rhino Software Inc. (hereinafter the “RhinoSoft”) developed “Serv-U”, a widely adopted FTP server software. In recent years, RhinoSoft have been trying to enforce its rights against the unauthorized use of Serv-U in China. Our previous post Analysis on the Assumption of Liability in the Serv-U Infringement Lawsuit in China has already introduced some of our analysis on this issue. In today’s post, we will be doing a complete analysis of the problems and potential solutions of RhinoSoft’s enforcement of rights in the proceeding litigation from a practical perspective.

READ MORE

Why Ronghe Shaofang Wine constituted Trademark Infringement to Maotai Wine?

Posted on by
贵州茅台

(By You Yunting)Maotai, a well-known Chinese baijiu (the classic Chinese alcohol made from distilled sorghum that averages an alcohol content from of 53 percent), is made in Maotai Town, Huanren city in Guizhou Province. In Maotai town, there are many liquor factories but only the KWEICHOW MOUTAI CO., LTD (the “MOUTAI”) holds the “贵州茅台酒” trademark (the “disputed trademark”). On account of “Maotai” brand name glamour, such free riders likeother liquor factories’ use of the disputed trademark often happen. We would like to introduce a typical case regarding that Guizhou Ronghe Shaofang Wine Business Limited Company used a same bottle label and packaging with that of Maotai Wine but carries its “荣和”（pronounced “Ronghe” in English）brand in our today’s post. The final binding judgment contained by Beijing No.2 Intermediate People’s Court decided that such act of using the same bottle label and  packaging constituted trademark infringement.

READ MORE

Why Guangzhou Intermediate People’s Court Decided the Contractual Terms not Protect by the Copyright Law?

Posted on by

(By Luo Yanjie) Abstract: The Implementing Regulations of the Copyright law stipulates “works” under the protection of the Copyright Law shall be under originality. “Originality” can be divided into two parts: independent creation and the minimum intellectual creation.

An enterprise filed a suit to the courts, alleging the defendant copied its contractual terms. One would wonder whether the terms of a contract shall be protected by the Copyright Law. The Guangzhou Intermediate People’s Court provided an answer that the terms in a contract may not be protected by the Copyright Law owing to the expression limitation of a contract. Here are the introduction to this case and our opinions for the following.

READ MORE

Why NEXON’s BNB Failed to Accuse Tencent’s “QQ堂” of Copyright Infringement?

Posted on by
paop

(By Luo Yanjie) Abstract:  The Copyright Law protects “expression” rather than “thought”. For the purposes of the Copyright Law, “works” refer to original intellectual creations in the literary, artistic and scientific domain, insofar as they are capable of being reproduced in a specific tangible form. Works without originality are not protected by these laws.

In recent years, there has been a serious plagiarism problem in the field of online games. Considering that online games act as computer software, laws protect its “code” other than game mode and method. The case in today’s post will elucidate this principle.

READ MORE

Instructions of the National Copyright Administration on Finite Expression Method of Computer Software

Posted on by

(By Luo Yanjie) Abstract: The principle of computer software infringement primarily involves materially similarity and contact. The similar or identical software does not constitute copyright infringement if the available expression methods are finite. But the similar or identical software shall be a work produced respectively and independently, and shall not be a plagiarized or copied one of others’.

Software industry is the heart and soul of the information industry and plays a crucial role in a country’s economic development all over the world. It is of great significance of setting clear standards on the protection scope of computer software and on the judgment of the software copyright infringement to protect the software industry. In today’s post, we will introduce a common problem in software infringement whether finite expression methods constitute an infringement or not, and an instruction of the National Copyright Administration on this problem for the following.

READ MORE

The Impact of Criminal Inducements and Controlled Deliveries on the Conviction of Business Secret Infringement Offences

Posted on by

(By Wu Pengbin)  1. Introduction

I was the defense counsel of this case, in which the defendant was induced to conduct an illicit transaction and involved in a controlled delivery. The case facts are summarized as follows:

The defendant, Mr. Zheng resigned from his employment as an engineer from the informant, Sany Heavy Industry Co., Ltd. (referred to as ‘SANY’ hereafter) two years ago before the crime was committed. As charged by the People’s Procuratorate of Fengxian District, Mr. Zheng sold SANY’s technical drawings he illicitly obtained to ‘Mr. Zhou’, who paid in cash for the sale (at the price of RMB 700,000), and was caught red-handed by the police of Fengxian Public Security Bureau. The drawings sold by Mr. Zheng was recognized to be business confidential and worth about RMB 800,000.

READ MORE

What is the Weakness of Getty Images China’s Protection Litigation against Photo Infringement?

Posted on by

(By You Yunting) Recently, Getty Images China brought cases regarding copyright infringement arose from Weibo to courts. These companies sued by Getty Images China almost take a similar pattern like that: first these companies have outsourced its right of operation for their Weibo to ads enterprises, then on its Weibo ads enterprises published photos that Getty Images China owned in their thought, and finally these companies were sued by Getty Images China. Some customers asked us how to face such litigation. We will share our analysis on this question and introduce a case which Getty Images China lost its litigation in the Supreme People’s Court.

READ MORE