Bridge IP Law Commentary - Page 23 of 66 - Your Guide to China IP Law！

China’s Courts won’t Prohibit a Trademark Squatting with Post-Approval

Posted on December 20, 2013 by yytbest

(By Luo Yanjie) Abstract: “Agent” in conduct of Agent’s preemptive registration refers to “trademark agents, representatives or other agents and representatives based on sales and agency relationship such as distribution and agency”. Commodities that no agent or representative may apply for registration include commodities same as the commodities where the trademarks of the principals or the persons represented are attached to as well as other similar commodities. Considering trademark is a private right, judicial institutions shall fully respect parties’ autonomy.

How Mobile Game Protects its Intellectual Property Right?

Posted on December 19, 2013 by yytbest

(By You Yunting) Recently stock markets have heightened topics about mobile game and serious competition disputes of intellectual property rights (the “IPR”) between China mobile games enterprises are often appeared in the newspapers. According to the reports, Beijing Chukong Inc., the developer of popular “捕鱼达人”(Fishing Joy) mobile games, was engaged in a controversy of IRP because earlier in December the Guangzhou-based SEALY Technology suspected Beijing Chukong Inc.’s “捕鱼达人”(Fishing Joy) of plagiarism on its arcade game product “捕鱼达人”. In response, Beijing Chukong Inc. alleged that: first, the online time of its “捕鱼达人”(Fishing Joy) was earlier than that of SEALY Technology and its mobile game had been reported to the Ministry of Culture. Second, Beijing Chukong Inc. owns the “捕鱼达人”trademark. Third, there are significant differences in art images and playing methods between two products.

Legal Basis for Chrysler Group’s Anti-dilution Protection on Its Well-known “JEEP” Trademark in China

Posted on December 18, 2013 by yytbest

(By Luo Yanjie) Today we would like to introduce a typical case regarding Chrysler Group’s countering a subsequent “free-rider” who attempted to register “JEEP” trademark under Class 2 for oil paint through the anti-dilution legal protection on well-known trademarks.

Introduction to the Case:

Plaintiff: Chrysler Group LLC (the “Chrysler”)

Defendant: Trademark Office of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce (the “Trademark Office”) and Guangdong-based Dongguan Xiehe Chemical Co., Ltd (the “Xiehe Chemical”)

When a Preceding User of a Trademark Counters a Subsequent Registrant in China?

Posted on December 17, 2013 by yytbest

(By Luo Yanjie) Abstract: China’s new Trademark Law still enforces the principle of “first to file,” but at the same time a prior user of a trademark only need prove to some extent that their prior use of a registered trademark had a degree of popularity, and need not prove that a subsequent user of the trademark “squatted” the trademark by registering it. If the board approves such prior use, the prior user will have the right to continue using the trademark in the original scope of use. “Improper means” as stated in Article 31 of the Trademark Law, refers to situations “where the applicant knows or should have known that the trademark had been used by others with a certain degree of influence, and preemptively registered the same, then such applicant shall be determined to have used improper means to register the mark.”

The Confusion of Affiliated Companies shall Assume Joint Liability for Their Debts

Posted on December 16, 2013 by yytbest

(By Luo Yanjie) Abstract: Company’s independent status as a legal person is a prerequisite for bearing liabilities independently incurred to the company. If a company loses its independent status as a legal person, shareholders shall bear several and joint liability for the debts of the company or the affiliated company, similarly for debts incurred in affiliated companies.

In recent years, there are many disputes regarding abuse of company’s independent status as a legal person that many intelligent merchants attempted to evade the payments of debts by abusing the company’s independent status as a legal person or the limited liability of shareholders. In today’s post, we would like to introduce a typical case regarding the confusion of company’s independent status as a legal person on the Cases Guidance of the Supreme People’s Court in China as follows.

The Impact of Criminal Inducements and Controlled Deliveries on the Conviction of Business Secret Infringement Offences

Posted on December 14, 2013 by yytbest

(By Wu Pengbin) 1. Introduction

I was the defense counsel of this case, in which the defendant was induced to conduct an illicit transaction and involved in a controlled delivery. The case facts are summarized as follows:

The defendant, Mr. Zheng resigned from his employment as an engineer from the informant, Sany Heavy Industry Co., Ltd. (referred to as ‘SANY’ hereafter) two years ago before the crime was committed. As charged by the People’s Procuratorate of Fengxian District, Mr. Zheng sold SANY’s technical drawings he illicitly obtained to ‘Mr. Zhou’, who paid in cash for the sale (at the price of RMB 700,000), and was caught red-handed by the police of Fengxian Public Security Bureau. The drawings sold by Mr. Zheng was recognized to be business confidential and worth about RMB 800,000.

How an Employer Terminates a Labor Contract with an Unqualified Laborer in China?

Posted on December 13, 2013 by yytbest

(By Luo Yanjie) Abstract: “where a laborer is unqualified for his work and remains unqualified even after receiving a training or an adjustment to another work post”, the employer may terminate a labor contract. The employer shall, if terminates a labor contract with an unqualified laborer, prove the employer to be incompetent from many aspects not just based on a bad performance.

Pursuant to the Labor Contract Law, there are many conditions for termination of a labor contract with laborers. Among these conditions, the most used one is that a labor is unqualified for his work. This means, the employer may not consider rescinding a labor contract unless a laborer is unqualified for his work. During the process of termination, among many disputes between laborers and employers, we would like to introduce a typical cases regarding termination of an unqualified laborer from Case Guidance of the Supreme People’s Court.

What is the Weakness of Getty Images China’s Protection Litigation against Photo Infringement?

Posted on December 12, 2013 by yytbest

(By You Yunting) Recently, Getty Images China brought cases regarding copyright infringement arose from Weibo to courts. These companies sued by Getty Images China almost take a similar pattern like that: first these companies have outsourced its right of operation for their Weibo to ads enterprises, then on its Weibo ads enterprises published photos that Getty Images China owned in their thought, and finally these companies were sued by Getty Images China. Some customers asked us how to face such litigation. We will share our analysis on this question and introduce a case which Getty Images China lost its litigation in the Supreme People’s Court.

Internet Society of China Published the Convention of Self-Discipline for Internet Terminal Security Service

Posted on December 11, 2013 by yytbest

(By You Yunting) On December 4, 2013, Internet Society of China (the “ISC”) published the Convention of Self-Discipline for Internet Terminal Security Service (the “Convention”) in Beijing. Those eight Internet terminal security service providers, such as Tencent (0700.HK), Baidu (NASD: BIDU), QIHOO (NYSE:QIHU), Kingsoft Corporation Limited (03888.HK), RISING, Jiangmin Technology, TOPSEC and NetIQ Mobile Inc, signed on the Convention. Afterwards, there are about 23 companies, i.e. SOHU (NASDAQ:SOHU), Sogou, Xunlei and Xiaomi Technology signing related documents in favor of the Convention. The Convention, comprising of 6 chapters and 27 articles, aims to protect legal interests of users, maintain a fair and harmonious market competitive environment and promote the healthy development of internet industry.

How China Government Regulates Risk Prevention for Bitcoin Transaction？

Posted on December 6, 2013 by yytbest

(By You Yunting) The Circular on Issues Concerning Risks Prevention forBitcoinwas published on December 3^rdin regards to regulating the bitcoin bubble, a virtual currency bubble, that has exploded in popularity in China and soared in value in recent months.The circular was issued jointly by People’s Bank of China, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (the “MIIT”), China Banking Regulatory Commission (the “CBRC”), China Securities Regulatory Commission (the “CSRC”) and China Insurance Regulatory Commission (the “CIRC”), which states that Bitcoin has no legal status of monetary equivalent and must not circulate on the Chinese market.

MOC Issues New Censorship Regulation on Online Game and Online Music

Posted on December 5, 2013 by yytbest

(By You Yunting) Pursuant to the Implementing the Administrative Measures for Content Self-review of Network Culture Operators that came into effect on December 1, 2013, an Internet entity holding an Internet Culture Business License may be entitled to self-examine the contents of online game and online music but the operators of said internet entity need to attend a content self-review training hosted by the Ministry of Culture.

The specific contents are as follows:

1. Licensed Scope of Business:

Why BURBERRY’s Classic Pattern Registered Trademark was Revoked in China？

Posted on December 4, 2013 by yytbest

(By You Yunting) Earlier in November, China’s Trademark Office announced canceling Burberry’s trademark of the “Haymarket Check” in China, known as iconic tan, black and red tartan (the “disputed trademark”), under Class 18 for packaging and bags because Burberry had not even used the registered trademark for over three years in China by the media.

A Chinese bag and apparel maker Polo Santa Roberta, who had disputes with Burberry for many years, filed an application with the China’s Trademark Office for revoking the disputed trademark that Burberry had not used for over three years. The State Trademark Office decided to revoke Burberry’s trademark due to inadequate evidence from Burberry after consideration, but Burberry applied for review with the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, triggering heated debates in China.

How Patentees Protect its Publicized Invention without Grant of Patent Rights?

Posted on December 2, 2013 by yytbest

(By Luo Yanjie) Abstract: After the official publication of an application for a patent of invention, the applicant may demand the entity or individual exploiting that invention to pay an appropriate fee, but is not entitled to prevent others from using the patent. After grant of patent rights by the patent office, the applicant has no right of demanding the subsequent entity or individual to pay an appropriate fee. In today’s post, our case is involved in the 2011 Min Ti Zi No. 259 Civil Judgment of the Supreme People’s Court’s

Why China’s Courts Held an Ambiguous Attitude to the Rush Registration of Another’s Works as a Trademark?

Posted on November 25, 2013 by yytbest

When handling a dispute between trademark and copyright, Chinese courts always apply a rather high standard to determine whether works protected under trademark law will also receive protection under the copyright law. Our website previously discussed this question in the posts Analysis on Proof Requirements in Figurative Trademark Infringing Others’ Copyright Cases by China Court and Why the Calligraphic Character’s Copyright Failed to Defeat Trademark Right.Today, we’d like to introduce a case regarding conflicts between a work of fine art and a trademark, due to the identical combination of Chinese characters and English letters.

Why Shanghai Court Enforces Trademark’s Diligence Obligation on Original Equipment Manufacture?

Posted on November 21, 2013 by yytbest

(By You Yunting) Original Equipment Manufacture (the“OEM”) refers to a commercial model where the Principal person is responsible for the brand, research and design, and marketing, meanwhile, the manufacturer is responsible for production. As a big manufacturing country, OEM is an important way for our manufactured products to participate in international competition. Under China’s Laws, however, it is unclear whether OEM constitutes as a trademark infringement, and local courts have handed out different decisions for this problem. According to the author’s information, Fujian higher court, Zhejiang higher court and Shanghai higher court held that OEM manufacturers does not involve trademark infringement, but Guangdong higher court decided that the OEM manufacturers shall take responsibility for trademark infringement in many cases. The Supreme Court has not yet expressed its opinion towards this problem.