By You Yunting

According to the report, an insider said :” The New iPad will be officially on sale in the middle of this month in China mainland. Many dealers have begun to book orders. In addition, the insider said that Apple Inc and WeiGuan company have reached a” reconciliation” on some extent in the case of trademark IPAD in mainland.

According to the information announced by the website of Telecommunication Equipment Certification Center (A department under Chinese Ministry of industry and information technology ) in the end of last month, a mobile device of Apple( Apple, Inc., AAPL ) compatible with China Unicom ( China Unicom Ltd., CHU ) has obtained the license. From the wording of Telecommunication Equipment Certification Center, the device should be the Apple ‘s new iPad.

More iPad related posts as follows:

1. No “iPad” Chinese trademark right for Apple after payment in the transaction, and our analysis——the Key points to the trademark transaction under the frame of China laws;

2. According to China Court’s First Instance Judgement, Apple Loses the iPad Trademark;

3. The Extension of the iPad Trademark Battle: Proview Charged iPad Distributor GOME in China;

4. Before 2nd Instance of iPad Trademark Dispute: iPad was Withdrew in Some Cities by Local Chinese Government;

5. Once Apple Lost iPad Trademark: Would There be A Name Change on iPad3 in China?

6. When Could Come the Decision of the 2nd Instance on the iPad Trademark Dispute？

7. Latest News: Proview Plans to Apply for iPad Import Prohibition in Custom;

8. iPad Trademark Dispute: Amazon China Stops Selling iPad on Demand of Apple;

9. Where Apple’s Confidence Comes from in iPad Trademark Dispute?

10. iPad Trademark Battle and China Corporate Personality Confusion System;

Lawyer Contacts

You Yunting

86-21-52134918

youyunting@debund.com, yytbest@gmail.com

For further information, please contact the lawyer as listed above or through the methods in our CONTACTS.

Bridge IP Law Commentary’s posts, including the comments and opinions contained herein, shall not be construed as the legal advice on any issues related. The contents are for general information purposes only. Anyone willing to quote or refer the posts to any other publications or for any other purposes, no matter there’s benefits gained or not, shall first get the written consent from Bridge IP Law Commentary and used under the discretion of us. As to the application of the reprint permission for any of our posts, please email us to the above addresses. The publication of this post or transmission of it through mail, internet or other methods does not constitute  an attorney-client relationship. The views set forth here are of due diligence, neutrality and impartiality, representing our own opinions only and are our original works.

Short Link: